| Author |
Message |
    
Winner
Pilla Bewarse
Username: Winner
Post Number: 166
Registered: 05-2017
Posted From: 54.172.59.33
Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Monday, May 22, 2017 - 8:22 am: |
|
Two birds in hand(Pubjab, Goa) is better than one bird(Delhi) in hand ani believe chesina manishi. |
Hotmail
Kurra Bewarse
Username: Hotmail
Post Number: 2161
Registered: 02-2009
Posted From: 27.59.122.120
Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Monday, May 22, 2017 - 2:57 am: |
|
Politics lo murders vundavu only suicide ki inko example kejriwal |
Hotmail
Kurra Bewarse
Username: Hotmail
Post Number: 2160
Registered: 02-2009
Posted From: 27.59.122.120
Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Monday, May 22, 2017 - 2:54 am: |
|
Jaitley files another Rs 10 cr suit against Kejriwal after Jethmalani calls him crook:
BJP's Arun Jaitley has filed a fresh Rs 10 crore suit against Arvind Kejriwal after the Deli CM's counsel Ram Jethmalani used the word 'crook' while during cross-examination in court.
India Today reports that Jaitley's lawyer Manik Dogra said that they have filed a fresh suit for defamation against Arvind Kejriwal seeking Rs 10 crore in damages for ex-facie defamation as his lawyer Ram Jethmalani, in the open court, called Jaitley a crook.
Dogra added that the statement by Jethmalani was recorded in the judicial order, where he had stated that he used the words on "specific instructions of his client" Kejriwal.
The fresh defamation suit by Jaitley will now be a separate case from the ongoing defamation suit against Kejriwal and five other Aam Aadmi Party leaders, also of Rs 10 crore.
Last week, the Delhi High Court saw Jaitley losing his cool when Jethmalani, 93, used the word "crook" to describe him.
Jaitley, who appeared before Joint Registrar Deepali Sharma, asked Jethmalani whether the word was used as per instructions from Kejriwal.
Jethmalani replied saying the said word has been used by him on instructions from his client (Kejriwal). "If this is so, I would aggravate the charges against the defendant (Kejriwal)," said an upest Jaitley, adding there was a limit to personal malice.
However, Anupam Srivastav, advocate on record for Kejriwal since the beginning of the suit, submitted that Jathmalani had no instructions to use the word against Jaitley.
Jethmalani went on to say that in a suit for defamation, the personal character of the plaintiff is extremely important. "I am conducting a case, wherein I intend to prove that he (Jaitley) has no reputation whatsoever.
This man does not even deserve a paisa from this suit against the defendants," he added.
In December 2015, Jaitley had filed the first civil defamation suit seeking Rs 10 crore damages from Kejriwal and five other AAP leaders - Raghav Chadha, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh and Deepak Bajpai - for accusing him of financial irregularities in the Delhi and District Cricket Association (DDCA) of which he was the President from 2000 to 2013. |
|
Archives - 2017