Andhravodu
Kurra Bewarse Username: Andhravodu
Post Number: 1021 Registered: 04-2017 Posted From: 69.62.241.11
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 | Posted on Tuesday, May 29, 2018 - 9:06 am: | |
Factoryofsadness:when i said you are not looking at all sides, i meant that "you are ignoring the fat that brad reached conf. finals without his top best 2 players "... this point is conviniently being thrown under the carpet... not the fact that brad is not a good or great coach... if you or anybody wants to call brad an average coach, pls do..but do it wholistically
Considering that metric, Ty Lue was able to do it with only 1 player. Ty Lue >>> Stevens? Gordon Hayward didn't play 1 full game for boston, so he is not their top 2 player. Top 2 player for boston would be Al horford and he had ~25 ppg in their wins vs. bucks. If bucks won game 7, all this brad stevens hype would've been rightfully squashed Looking holistically, one achievement brad was able to do is develop jayson tatum. with the same benchmark, Nate mcmillan improved victor oladipo and bojanovic, so he's better tatum and mitchell are both rookies. Quin snyder got more out of his players in both regular season and playoffs. End of the day, both are above average, and there is no shame in that. But there's levels to this stuff, and both have ways to go |