| Author | Message | ||
     Thedarkknight Pilla Bewarse Username: Thedarkknight Post Number: 537 Registered: 07-2008 Posted From: 183.83.26.5 Rating: N/A |
In my humble opinion, countries that provide “Free/Highly affordable” & Hygienic healthcare (through tax-paid money) with all the facilities can be considered as “developed nations”. Going by the noble definition of “Any system that gets all the basics right can be considered as well balanced”. Even otherwise, “Universal healthcare” would help to great extent as well. Most of the Euro nations and Canada provide really good healthcare for almost free of cost to the people. Unfortunately, “United states of America” doesn’t figure in this list of nations that provide good healthcare. Obama tried to do something like “universal healthcare”, but seems like he couldn’t succeed for some obvious reasons  . Vellunnappudu Mee opinions pettandi. My reasons are below: > Healthcare is basic human right, and overall health of the nation depends on the health of the people. > High privatization of healthcare can lead to medical mafia & has adverse effects on the nation overall > Government Access to public health records (advantage of Universal healthcare), provides the ability to observe patterns and investigate the root causes ( Like Khaleja movie ) that in turn can possibly nullify the medical crime. High privatization of healthcare would hinder the investigation as the private companies may not be able to co-operate with the government investigation by sharing the data. > In such systems, Overall Health of people is more or less directly tied to election process of the local and top most nodes and they would be careful in their duties ( Good governance ) to retain power at least ( if not for clean record ) |