![Top of page](http://www.bewarsetalk.net/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](http://www.bewarsetalk.net/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](http://www.bewarsetalk.net/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](http://www.bewarsetalk.net/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Gochi2
Kurra Bewarse Username: Gochi2
Post Number: 1710 Registered: 12-2005 Posted From: 173.67.195.21
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 | Posted on Thursday, December 24, 2015 - 10:25 am: | |
ido pedda bokka rule aa vundhi: It appears that there are two troublesome conditions for EAD: (1) Requirement of proof of "compelling reasons" and (2) For EAD extensions, priority date is within one-year of the Visa Bulletin cut-off date. It thus appears that the proposed rule which was just approved for I-140 portability/EAD reform indirectly demands the I-140 approved foreign workers to maintain nonimmigrant status rather than EAD when they change employment based on the new 140 portability under the forthcoming reform rule. The reform thus appears to give opportunity to change employment in a same or similar occupations before they file I-485 without losing the approved I-140 but will require that the foreign worker maintain the nonimmigrant status when they port to another employer. It appears this restrinction may be intended to accomodate the pressures from the employers that oppose this reform. naa M lodhi ee DB okati!!
|