Topics Topics Help/Instructions Help Edit Profile Profile Member List Register Paatha Gnyapakaalu - Archives from Old DB  
Search New Posts 1 | 2 | 8 Hours Search New Posts 1 | 3 | 7 Days Search Search Tree View Tree View Latest tweets Live Tweets   Hide Images

Rate this post by selecting a number. 1 is the worst and 5 is the best.

    (Worst)    1    2    3    4    5     (Best)

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sachinfan
Celebrity Bewarse
Username: Sachinfan

Post Number: 35654
Registered: 10-2010
Posted From: 8.28.19.75

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0

Posted on Tuesday, June 17, 2014 - 11:06 am:   

and for the record, SC clarified section 354 as follows:

The Supreme Court in 2007 had clarified the meaning of the Victorian term still in use in the IPC — 'outraging a woman's modesty." It observed its lack of definition in the IPC and said, "The essence of a woman's modesty is her sex."

if this is the case zinta garu self goal eskunnaru kada.. FIR statement is contradicting the section charged on ness..


Jai Rahul baba.. Jai women empowerment.. Jai zinta..
MOVIEART--bwalk
Signature... inka edi decide kaaledu CLIPART--smoke

Topics | Last Hour | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration