Sachinfan
Celebrity Bewarse Username: Sachinfan
Post Number: 35654 Registered: 10-2010 Posted From: 8.28.19.75
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 | Posted on Tuesday, June 17, 2014 - 11:06 am: | |
and for the record, SC clarified section 354 as follows: The Supreme Court in 2007 had clarified the meaning of the Victorian term still in use in the IPC — 'outraging a woman's modesty." It observed its lack of definition in the IPC and said, "The essence of a woman's modesty is her sex." if this is the case zinta garu self goal eskunnaru kada.. FIR statement is contradicting the section charged on ness.. Jai Rahul baba.. Jai women empowerment.. Jai zinta..
Signature... inka edi decide kaaledu
|