Topics Topics Help/Instructions Help Edit Profile Profile Member List Register Paatha Gnyapakaalu - Archives from Old DB  
Search New Posts 1 | 2 | 8 Hours Search New Posts 1 | 3 | 7 Days Search Search Tree View Tree View Latest tweets Live Tweets   Hide Images

Rate this post by selecting a number. 1 is the worst and 5 is the best.

    (Worst)    1    2    3    4    5     (Best)

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Musicfan
Celebrity Bewarse
Username: Musicfan

Post Number: 45760
Registered: 05-2004
Posted From: 66.117.193.162

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0

Posted on Tuesday, December 17, 2013 - 1:20 pm:   

As a consular officer, Khobragade had certain privileges — even if she did not have diplomatic immunity — which New Delhi believes were denied to her. She had limited immunity as a consular officer and could be arrested only if her crime was grave. The government is backing Khobragade's lawyer's contention that if her crime was indeed grave, why she was released on bail just two hours after her arrest.

The state department earlier responded to the summoning of envoy Nancy Powell by foreign secretary Sujatha Singh by declaring that the consular officer did not have immunity under VCCR. India, however, sees this as an attempt to deflect attention from the real issue — the humiliation in public of an Indian diplomat.

New Delhi has highlighted how the US authorities had violated Article 41 (Section 3) of VCCR which says that proceedings against a consular officer "shall be conducted with the respect due to him by reason of his official position."



http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Diplomat-Devyani-strip-searched-India-s nubs-US-team/articleshow/27488890.cms
Bhai - Audio Review

Topics | Last Hour | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration